Join Fund Library now and get free access to personalized features to help you manage your investments.
The modern-day fiduciary, faced with lower interest rates and higher income needs than their predecessors, should heed the words of Albert Einstein, who once said, “in the middle of difficulty, lies opportunity.”
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI), Office of the Chief Actuary, summarized this challenge from the perspective of a public sector pension plan stating, “the costs of federal public sector pension plans are subject to upward pressure due to a low interest rate environment and improved longevity.”1 During the same period, investment professionals coined the concept of a 60/40 portfolio, anchored in the belief that bonds would produce meaningful income, while also providing a hedge against equities. But that idea has since been disrupted by lower interest rates, which force fiduciaries to lean more heavily on dividend-paying stocks than yield-starved bonds. This overweighting to equities satisfies an income need, though it does raise the question: What’s the impact on risk?
In the current environment, the challenge for fiduciaries is two-fold: First, determine how much equity allocation is required to meet income requirements; and second, to identify and select equity strategies that simultaneously manage risk and maximize income.
Option overlay strategies have emerged in recent years as an innovative solution to this problem. By writing options contracts on a basket of high-quality stocks, investors can collect premiums to enhance their income yet still participate in rising equity markets. Instead of being a peril, volatility can be cultivated as an additional income source.
In physics, the law of conservation of energy states that energy can be transformed from one form to another, but can be neither created nor destroyed. Volatility, in this metaphor, is the “energy” of a security, in the sense that whether or not it’s high or low, it is always present. An option contract is a tool that transforms volatility from an observable phenomenon into a source of yield.
While this all sounds great in theory, executing these strategies is more difficult:
To improve access and ease-of-use, there emerged exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that helped investors access the benefits of “selling vol” in a straightforward, scalable product. The first iteration was covered call ETFs, which provided three advantages to investors:
1. Enhanced yield. Investors earn the underlying dividends as well as an option premium, thereby increasing the earning power of their equities;
2. Lower risk. Increased income from selling options offsets some of the inherent equity risk in the underlying stocks. Additionally, there is an inverse relationship between markets and volatility – volatility rises when markets fall. In other words, investors who sell options get paid more when markets are riskier;
3. Tax efficiency. Options premia are taxable as capital gains, making them highly effective. This is especially important when harnessing dividend strategies in foreign markets, where dividends are taxed as foreign income. On a post-tax basis, option premium may provide more income than foreign dividends.
The innovation of these ETFs effectively allows the prudent investor to reap all the benefits of “selling vol” without the hassle.
Benjamin Franklin once said, “In this world nothing can be said to be certain, except death and taxes,” so it’s nice to find a strategy that both increases your yield and is tax-efficient. This is primarily of concern to wealth managers, whose clientele of high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth families are highly exposed to marginal differences in tax rates.
As the world’s largest options overlay ETF provider,2 we have developed a very coherent methodology which strives to balance yield enhancement with the compound effects of longterm growth. We have three variables to evaluate:
1. How much of the portfolio to cover? Our target is to write contracts on approximately 50% of every holding in the portfolio. All companies will be written to the same degree, though strike prices will be determined on a per-company basis. Writing approximately half the portfolio means the unpledged portion can rise commensurately with the market. Consider the alternative: if we were to write the whole portfolio, we would assume unwanted upside risk, meaning we may be forced to buy back positions at higher prices if the stocks were called.
2. What is the contract term? The options curve is steeper over the first 60 days, so we prefer to write 30- or 60-day contracts, aiming for the agreement to expire worthless as quickly as possible. This ensures we can maximize our premium income, and also means our writing decisions are based on the most upto-date market volatility information.
3. How far out-of-the-money? We always write out of the money (OTM) options with the primary goal of safeguarding the principal investment. As volatility rises in a falling market, we write further OTM to protect from a market rebound, which means we earn higher premiums while protecting the capital in a rising market.
The next iteration of this strategy was launched in 2020 when our team added put options into the mix. This meant “selling vol” in both directions, earning premiums whether the stock went up or down. And the best part? There’s an understandable skew in options pricing, whereby put premiums will be 2.5 to 3 times higher than those on call options contracts. This is to be expected, because it’s natural to pay more to ensure a position than to speculate on upside growth.
The resulting ETF – BMO Premium Yield ETF (TSX: ZPAY). The product’s construction is simple, but effective:
Armed with this approach, the equity position will rise in a declining market only to fall into the target range when the market rebounds. ZPAY has a comparable yield to the covered call ETFs mentioned above, though its fractional market exposure sets it apart. With approximately 30% invested in equity markets, it provides a uniquely diversified equity play in a balanced portfolio.
Daniel Stanley, CFA, is Director, Institutional & Advisory, Ontario, at BMO ETFs. To learn more, or other ideas to optimize your portfolios, reach out to a BMO ETF Specialist.
This article first appeared in the Winter 2022 issue of Your Guide to ETF Investing, published by Brights Roberts Inc. Reprinted with permission.
Notes and Disclaimer
1. Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) Office of the Chief Actuary, “Funding Risks for Federal Public Sector Pension Plans – Presentation to the Board of Directors of PSP Investments,” February 14, 2019.
2. Bloomberg, Covered Call AUM, December 2021.
Content copyright © 2022 by Brights Roberts Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part by any means without prior written permission is prohibited. Used with permission
Any statement that necessarily depends on future events may be a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although such statements are based on assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. In connection with any forward-looking statements, investors should carefully consider the areas of risk described in the most recent simplified prospectus.
The viewpoints expressed by the author represents his assessment of the markets at the time of publication. Those views are subject to change without notice at any time without any kind of notice. The information provided herein does not constitute a solicitation of an offer to buy, or an offer to sell securities nor should the information be relied upon as investment advice. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
The statistics in this update are based on information believed to be reliable but not guaranteed. This article is for information purposes. The information contained herein is not, and should not be construed as, investment, tax or legal advice to any party. Investments should be evaluated relative to the individual’s investment objectives and professional advice should be obtained with respect to any circumstance.
Commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with investments in exchange traded funds. Please read the ETF Facts or prospectus before investing. The indicated rates of return are the historical annual compounded total returns including changes in unit value and reinvestment of all dividends or distributions and do not take into account sales, redemption, distribution or optional charges or income taxes payable by any unitholder that would have reduced returns.
Exchange traded funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and past performance may not be repeated. For a summary of the risks of an investment in the BMO ETFs, please see the specific risks set out in the prospectus. BMO ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade at a discount to their net asset value, which may increase the risk of loss. Distributions are not guaranteed and are subject to change and/or elimination.
BMO ETFs are managed by BMO Asset Management Inc., which is an investment fund manager and a portfolio manager, and a separate legal entity from Bank of Montreal. BMO Global Asset Management comprises BMO Asset Management Inc. and BMO Investments Inc.
®/™Registered trade-marks/trade-mark of Bank of Montreal, used under licence.
Join Fund Library now and get free access to personalized features to help you manage your investments.
Fund Library
