Join Fund Library now and get free access to personalized features to help you manage your investments.
U.S. value stocks are poised to outperform growth: This might seem a relatively safe prediction. After all, shares in U.S. companies with relatively low valuations and high dividend yields have outperformed their growth counterparts so far this year.1 And as our recent research shows, the coming reversal of fortunes would restore the decades-long performance edge that academic researchers have ascribed to value stocks.
Investors, younger ones especially, may be skeptical. Powered by a relentless rise in technology share prices, growth stocks have handily outpaced value – the province of financial, utility, energy, and basic materials companies, among others – since the 2008 global financial crisis.
To better understand past results and provide estimates of future returns, we identified fundamental forces – some secular, others cyclical – that drive changes in the value-growth relationship and constructed a related fair-value model. Our model suggests that value stocks' underperformance in recent years owes mainly to fundamental drivers, particularly low inflation rates, which boost the relative attractiveness of growth stocks’ more-distant cash flows. But investor behavior has played a role as well.
We expect value to outperform growth over the next 10 years by five to seven percentage points, annualized, and perhaps by an even wider margin over the next five years.
To be clear, our outlook is for the style factors, or what might be termed “pure” value and growth portfolios. These differ from both the academic value-growth data presented in the first chart and style-specific market indexes that serve as benchmarks for many real-world investment portfolios.
The Fama-French data have the virtue of a long history, dating to the Great Depression. But few investors are in position to implement the academic definition of value, which includes holding the cheapest stocks while selling short the most expensive stocks.2 To assess the performance of investable value and growth portfolios, we constructed market-capitalization-weighted indexes of companies in the bottom and top thirds of the Russell 1000 Index, sorted by price/book ratios and reconstituted monthly.
Why not simply examine the Russell-style indexes? Arguably, the indexes do a good job of representing active managers’ security selection. But that doesn’t make them ideal representations of the style factors themselves. Roughly 30% of Russell 1000 Index constituents appear in both the growth and value indexes, while the remaining 70% are classified exclusively as growth or value.
In our view, a stock thought to represent a style factor should, for analytical purposes at least, represent only one style. In our model, a company can be deemed only value or growth in any given month, though its classification may vary from month to month.
It’s well-known that asset prices can stray meaningfully from perceived fair values for extended periods. So why should investors expect value to outpace growth in the years ahead? For one, we believe the growth trade is overdone.
Our research found that deviations from fair value and future relative returns share an inverse and statistically significant relationship over five- and ten-year periods. The relationship is an affirmation that, ultimately, valuations matter – the price we pay influences our return. That’s intuitive, right? So, too, is the imperfection of our model: While it reveals a relationship between fair-value deviations and future results, its predictions for relative performance are imprecise. That’s consistent with investment risk enabling but not guaranteeing potential returns. Put another way, if valuations perfectly presaged performance, there'd be no risk. Fortunately, that’s not how markets work.
The large current deviation of growth-stock valuations relative to our fair-value estimates also helps make our case. The size of the deviation is similar to the one at the height of the dot-com bubble. When the bubble popped, value proceeded to outperform growth by 16%, annualized, over the next five years. We can’t be certain that growth stocks represent a bubble, but Vanguard’s global chief economist, Joe Davis, recently wrote about the pitfalls of low-quality growth stocks.
We believe that cyclical value-growth rotations are rooted in investor behavior and that investors become more price-conscious when profit growth is abundant. Since 2008, corporate profit growth has been insufficient to sustain value stocks.
Vanguard expects inflation to normalize and eventually exceed the Federal Reserve’s 2% target this year and next. Corporate profits should strengthen amid economic recovery from the pandemic. Still, their impact on the “fair value of value” may be modest. The ultimate driver of the coming rotation to value stocks, then, is apt to be a change in investors' appetite for risk.
For investors with sufficient risk tolerance, time horizons, and patience, an overweight to value stocks could help offset the lower broad-market returns we expect over the next decade.
1. For example, as of April 27, 2021, the Russell 1000 Value Index had returned 15.51% year-to-date, while the Russell 1000 Growth Index returned 8.65%.
2. A short sale occurs when an investor borrows and then sells a stock in anticipation of its price declining. If the price does decline, the investor can repurchase the shares to return them to the lender at a lower price, thereby profiting. If the price rises, however, losses ensue. Regulations limit short sales.
Kevin DiCiurcio, CFA, is head of the Vanguard Capital Markets Model® research team at The Vanguard Group, Inc.
Important Notes/Disclosures
© 2021 by Vanguard Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part by any means without prior written permission is prohibited. This article first appeared on the “Insights” page of the Vanguard Group, Inc.’s website. Used with permission.
All investing is subject to risk, including the possible loss of the money you invest. Investments in bonds are subject to interest rate, credit, and inflation risk.
The views expressed in this material are based on the author's assessment as of the first publication date (April 2021), are subject to change without notice and may not represent the views and/or opinions of Vanguard Investments Canada Inc. The author may not necessarily update or supplement their views and opinions whether as a result of new information, changing circumstances, future events or otherwise. Any "forward-looking" information contained in this material should be construed as general investment or market information and no representation is being made that any investor will, or is likely to achieve, returns similar to those mentioned in this material or anticipated in this material.
While this information has been compiled from sources believed to be reliable, Vanguard Investments Canada Inc. does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or reliability of this information or any results from its use.
This material is for informational purposes only. This material is not intended to be relied upon as research, investment, or tax advice and is not an implied or express recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to adopt any particular investment or portfolio strategy. Any views and opinions expressed do not take into account the particular investment objectives, needs, restrictions and circumstances of a specific investor and, thus, should not be used as the basis of any specific investment recommendation.
Investors should consult a financial and/or tax advisor for financial and/or tax information applicable to their specific situation.
Information, figures and charts are summarized for illustrative purposes only and are subject to change without notice.
In this material, references to "Vanguard" are provided for convenience only and may refer to, where applicable, only The Vanguard Group, Inc.
Join Fund Library now and get free access to personalized features to help you manage your investments.
Fund Library
