Try Fund Library Premium
Free with a 30 day trial!
U.S. stocks hit record highs even as the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupts global supply chains. A common narrative is that markets are disconnected as equities and credit hold firm while oil, commodities, and yields rise. We see no inconsistency. The AI buildout is offsetting the shock’s drag on growth, while energy markets still appear to be pricing eventual reopening of the Strait. That leaves inflation and higher yields as the key risk to our pro-risk stance.
Emerging market and U.S. equities are leading global markets since the start of the Middle East conflict on strong AI-linked earnings. See the left set of bars in the chart below. Countries exposed to the shock have lagged, while those tied to the AI boom, such as South Korea and Taiwan, have outperformed (middle set of bars). Sector trends tell a similar story, with AI-linked industries driving gains and inflation-exposed areas such as materials underperforming (right set of bars).
Policy expectations have been moving in the same direction. Markets are now pricing in about three rate hikes in Europe as inflation pressures build, whereas no change is expected in the U.S. And U.S. credit spreads are below pre-conflict levels, underscoring markets are not pricing in much economic damage. Conclusion: These patterns suggest that markets are pricing in earnings strength and the supply shock’s fallout to date.
The resilience in U.S. equities reflects the scale and breadth of the AI buildout. Expected S&P 500 earnings growth for the first quarter has climbed to about 28%, roughly double early-April levels, while MSCI EM tech earnings growth expectations have surged to around 160%. This strength is being reinforced by an emerging AI-driven cybersecurity arms race, sustaining demand for compute, cloud infrastructure and advanced models.
The numbers are staggering. The “magnificent seven” are tracking a 57% jump in quarterly earnings (with Nvidia yet to report), three times higher than Bloomberg estimates just last month. Capital spending is now estimated to reach as much as $725 billion this year, up some 10% from before earnings.
The AI buildout has so far outweighed the typical effect of a macro shock: a drag on growth and earnings that hurts equities. That leaves interest rates as the key mechanism through which the shock could challenge risk assets.
Higher energy and input costs are adding to already sticky inflation, with a more pronounced impact in Europe because of its greater exposure. At the same time, the AI buildout is increasing demand for capital – not only for technology infrastructure, but also for energy security and broader infrastructure rebuilding amid geopolitical fragmentation. Capital that previously flowed to the U.S. is increasingly being diverted to these needs, raising competition for funding and adding to upward pressure on long-term yields.
Equity markets are balancing growth against rates: Strong enough earnings growth can offset higher yields, as seen in the AI-driven surge since the launch of ChatGPT. The risk: If disruptions persist, the combined effect of higher inflation and rising capital demand could push yields high enough to weigh on valuations.
We stay pro-risk for now, overweighting U.S. and EM equities as beneficiaries of the AI buildout and commodity exports. We prefer equities over bonds and remain underweight long-term U.S. Treasuries, instead favoring short- and medium-term bonds for income. This stance is dependent on eventual normalization in the Strait of Hormuz even as there are still no signs of a reopening. A prolonged closure would likely shift the balance. It would lift inflation and rates enough to start weighing on valuations and tighten financial conditions, ultimately challenging both risk assets and the pace of the AI buildout.
We see no disconnect between record U.S. equities prices and elevated oil, commodities, and yields. Markets are pricing both AI-driven growth and the impact of the Middle East supply shock. We stay pro-risk as a result.
Wei Li, Managing Director, is the Global Chief Investment Strategist at BlackRock Investment Institute at BlackRock Inc.
Jean Boivin, Head – BlackRock Investment Institute, Beata Harasim, Senior Investment Strategist – BlackRock Investment Institute, and Ehsan Khoman, Economist – BlackRock Investment Institute, contributed to this article.
Disclaimer
This material is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. The opinions expressed are as of the date indicated and may change as subsequent conditions vary. The information and opinions contained in this post are derived from proprietary and nonproprietary sources deemed by BlackRock to be reliable, are not necessarily all-inclusive and are not guaranteed as to accuracy. As such, no warranty of accuracy or reliability is given and no responsibility arising in any other way for errors and omissions (including responsibility to any person by reason of negligence) is accepted by BlackRock, its officers, employees or agents. This post may contain “forward-looking” information that is not purely historical in nature. Such information may include, among other things, projections and forecasts. There is no guarantee that any of these views will come to pass. Reliance upon information in this post is at the sole discretion of the reader.
© 2026 BlackRock Inc. All rights reserved. iSHARES and BLACKROCK are registered trademarks of BlackRock, Inc., or its subsidiaries in the United States and elsewhere. This article first appeared April 6, 2026, on the BlackRock website. Used with permission.
Image: iStock.com/Peter Hansen
Try Fund Library Premium
Free with a 30 day trial!