What the Fed is likely to do

Cautious approach to rate setting means more of the same

U.S. growth is slowing. But to gauge both the loss of momentum and its policy implications, it’s important to sift carefully through the mix of new and revised data.

Past employment numbers have just suffered a significant downward revision: about 900,000 fewer jobs were created between April 2024 and March 2025. Nonfarm payrolls (NFPs) had indicated an increase of about 1.8 million, so this revision means that jobs growth has been only half as strong as we thought.

Jobs data are subject to frequent reassessments on a month-to-month basis, because a growing share of responses to the NFP survey are submitted late – the share of businesses that do not reply on time has doubled from 20% to 40% in the past 10 years. This is what happened with the May and June figures. This latest revision, however, is different – it happens once a year, and it benchmarks on a separate set of data: the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), which covers the near totality of U.S. jobs and relies primarily on actual data from state unemployment insurance programs, rather than surveys. The QCEW is a slower gauge, but much more comprehensive and accurate, so once a year the Bureau of Labor Statistics adjusts employment numbers to be more in line with its results – the “benchmark revision.”

This latest revision is the largest since 2008 – the runners up are the one made last year and that of 2009, both negative by over 800,000. Since 2008, the average annual revision has been just over 300,000 (in absolute terms). Over the last four years, however, it averaged over 600,000 – corroborating evidence that the quality of NFP survey data has deteriorated.

In some very important ways, however, this jobs revision does not change the macro picture very much.

The assessment that the labor market is broadly in balance at or close to full employment should not change, in my view. Wage growth has continued to run at a healthy, above-inflation 4% rate. If labor demand had been significantly weaker compared to supply, this should have been reflected in weaker wage growth.

The hard data on economic growth, from corporate profits to tax receipts, also remain unchanged. The broader assessment of the health of the economy, therefore, should not change dramatically. The volatile growth of the past year or so is still there – what’s new is that it is consistent with a lower employment level.

This has a couple of counterintuitive implications:

• The first is that the adverse impact on jobs growth coming from tariffs and trade uncertainty looks a lot smaller than we thought – benchmarked against much weaker jobs growth in the 12 months to the April tariff announcements.
• The second is that productivity growth must be stronger, if the same rise in economic activity has been achieved with fewer additional workers.

Both conclusions need to be taken with some caution, because this revision is preliminary and will be revised next February. But to the extent that it holds, what does it mean for the outlook? Tariff uncertainty remains, and some of the adverse impact will take more time to materialize – this uncertainty is clearly discouraging employers from hiring. But the fact that the negative effect on employment so far appears smaller than feared might alleviate concerns on what lies ahead. And if productivity growth is somewhat stronger, that bodes well for long-term growth and supports the view that the natural rate of interest is higher than the Federal Reserve (Fed) has been acknowledging.

Fed Chair Jerome Powell had already signaled concern about the latest signs of weaker jobs growth and noted that a labor market equilibrium at low levels of hiring implies more downward risks. Taken together with the latest uptick in jobless claims, this revision therefore likely seals the case for a 25-basis point (bp) cut in interest rates when the Fed meets this week. I do not expect a 50 bp cut, given that August inflation came in higher than expected, with core at 3.1% and headline at 2.9% (up from 2.7% in July).

Whether we see any additional rate cuts in the remainder of 2025 will depend mostly on the extent of any further labor market deterioration in the coming months. Uncertainty is high, but one additional 25 bp cut now looks more likely, especially if confirmed in the update to the Fed’s projections known as the “dots.” The current market reaction to the latest data however, with 10-year Treasury yields flirting with sub-4% levels, in my opinion is overdone and signals excessive optimism on future rate cuts. My view that we are back in an era of a higher neutral fed funds rate and higher long-term bond yields remains unchanged.

Sonal Desai, Ph.D. is the executive vice president and Chief Investment Officer for Franklin Templeton Fixed Income at Franklin Templeton. Originally published in the Franklin Templeton Insights page.

Disclaimer

Content copyright © 2025 by Franklin Templeton Canada. All rights reserved. Used with permission

What are the risks? All investments involve risks, including the possible loss of principal. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the full amount invested. Investing in the natural resources sector involves special risks, including increased susceptibility to adverse economic and regulatory developments affecting the sector. Special risks are associated with investing in foreign securities, including risks associated with political and economic developments, trading practices, availability of information, limited markets and currency exchange rate fluctuations and policies. Investments in foreign securities involve special risks including currency fluctuations, economic instability and political developments. Investments in emerging markets, of which frontier markets are a subset, involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with these markets’ smaller size, lesser liquidity and lack of established legal, political, business and social frameworks to support securities markets. Because these frameworks are typically even less developed in frontier markets, as well as various factors including the increased potential for extreme price volatility, illiquidity, trade barriers and exchange controls, the risks associated with emerging markets are magnified in frontier markets. To the extent a strategy focuses on particular countries, regions, industries, sectors or types of investment from time to time, it may be subject to greater risks of adverse developments in such areas of focus than a strategy that invests in a wider variety of countries, regions, industries, sectors or investments.

Important legal information. This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market.

Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton Investments (“FTI”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FTI accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FTI affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own professional adviser or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com - Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton Investments’ U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.

Image: iStock.com/manassanant pamai