Try Fund Library Premium
For Free with a 30 day trial!
In a riff on Donald Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” mantra, Mark Carney proclaims we must “build, baby, build.”
But build what? Carney is assembling a team to work on tha,t but in any discussion on the subject, pipelines are near the top of the list. Resurrect Northern Gateway. Revive Energy East. Restart Keystone XL. Build a pipeline to transport oil/natural gas to Churchill, Manitoba for overseas shipment via the unfreezing Arctic Ocean.
Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre wants us to build two new pipelines even if protestors “chain themselves to a tree.”
There’s just one small problem. Neither of our two major pipeline companies is showing much interest in any of these ideas.
In recent weeks, the reaction of both TC Energy and Enbridge to new Canadian mega-projects has been tepid at best. Both seem more interested in looking south. East, west, and north are not on their radar screens. The U.S. and Mexico offer much more in the way of risk-adjusted returns. Maybe the time will come for a new pipeline to Canadian tidewater, but it doesn’t seem to be on their priority lists right now.
Francois Poirier, CEO of Calgary based TC Energy, made this very clear during a conference call to discuss the company’s second quarter results.
“It’s nice to see a federal government that understands the sense of urgency around deploying capital to help make Canada an energy superpower,” he said. But it appears he’s not interested in being part of that plan, at least at present. The U.S. market is simply more attractive.
“Canada gas has to compete for capital with the other business units in the company. And currently, the risk-adjusted returns in the U.S. are meaningfully higher than in Canada,” Mr. Poirier said.
After spinning off its oil pipeline business to South Bow Corporation last year, TC Energy now focuses on natural gas. The company has about $8.5 billion in assets expected to come on stream this year. One that they’re excited about is the Southeast Gateway pipeline, which was completed in the second quarter on schedule and under budget. It will deliver natural gas to underserved regions in southeast Mexico.
Our other pipeline giant, Enbridge, is also more interested in looking south than in revisiting projects like Northern Gateway, which would have carried diluted bitumen and condensate to the BC coast. It was killed by a combination of First Nations and environmental opposition and a federal government ban on tanker traffic off British Columbia’s north coast.
While Northern Gateway is history, Enbridge has not ruled out building a new pipeline to the West Coast, but only if Ottawa makes major policy changes. These include declaring a project to be in the national interest, significant regulatory changes, and meaningful indigenous participation.
Another possibility that has been mentioned is the replacement and perhaps extension of the ageing Line 5 (built in 1953), which carries oil from the West to Michigan, Wisconsin, and Ontario. The State of Michigan is trying to shut it down, claiming the section under the Straits of Mackinac poses an environmental risk. Enbridge is fighting the move in court.
For now, Enbridge is more interested in its proposed Flanagan South pipeline, which would transport oil from Canada to the U.S. Gulf Coast. In a recent survey, it received a positive reaction from potential shippers.
Enbridge has some minor Canadian projects in the works, but the company is prioritizing smaller, faster developments in the U.S., where the regulatory conditions are less onerous.
Neither company has excited investors with their growth plans. Both stocks are underperforming the TSX Composite year to date, despite the high yields they offer.
Enbridge Inc. (TSX: ENB), based in Calgary, Alberta, is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. It operates an extensive network of crude oil, liquids, and natural gas pipelines as well as regulated natural gas distribution utilities and renewable power generation. Despite bouncing around like a yo-yo all year the stock is up 13% year-to-date.
The company released second quarter results on Aug. 1. GAAP earnings attributable to shareholders was almost $2.2 billion ($1 per share), compared with $1.8 billion ($0.86 a share) in the same period of 2024. Adjusted earnings were $1.4 billion ($0.65 per share), compared with $1.2 billion ($0.58 per share) in 2024.
For the first six months of the fiscal year, Enbridge earned $4.4 billion ($2.04 per share), a significant gain from $3.3 billion ($1.53 a share) last year.
Adjusted earnings before interest, income taxes, and depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) were $4.6 billion, an increase of 7% compared with $4.3 billion in 2024.
The quarterly payout is $0.9425 per share ($3.77 a year) for a yield of 5.8%.
The company said it does not expect tariffs to have a material impact on its operations or deployment of capital.
Enbridge would be suitable for income-oriented portfolios.
TC Energy Corp. (TSX: TRP), also based in Calgary, Alberta, is one of North America’s biggest pipeline companies, with 93,300 km of natural gas pipelines. It also owns or has interests in seven power generation facilities, including the Bruce nuclear facility in Ontario. As with Enbridge, there has been a lot of up and down movement in the share price this year, but the shares are up 11% year to date.
The company recently announced good second-quarter results. Net income attributable to shareholders was $862 million ($0.83 per share). That was up from $804 million ($0.78 a share) in the same period last year. For the first six months of the 2025 fiscal year, the company reported earnings of $1.84 billion ($1.77 per share), compared with $1.79 billion ($1.73 a share) in 2024. U.S. natural gas pipelines were the main segmented earnings contributors.
The stock pays a quarterly dividend of $0.85 a share ($3.40 a year) to yield 5% at the current price.
The company expects comparable EBITDA for 2025 to be higher than the original forecast, in the range of $10.8-$11.0 billion. Comparable earnings per share guidance remains the same and is expected to be lower than in 2024. Net capital expenditure guidance was reaffirmed at $5.5-$6.0 billion.
The stock would be suitable for income-oriented portfolios.
As always, consult with your financial advisor before investing in any stock to ensure it aligns with your risk tolerance and financial objectives.
Gordon Pape is one of Canada’s best-known personal finance commentators and investment experts. He is the publisher of The Internet Wealth Builder and The Income Investor newsletters, which are available through the Building Wealth website.
Follow Gordon Pape on X at X.com/GPUpdates and on Facebook at www.facebook.com/GordonPapeMoney.
For more information and details on how to subscribe to Gordon’s newsletters, go to www.buildingwealth.ca/subscribe.
Notes and Disclaimer
Content © 2025 by Gordon Pape Enterprises. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission. The foregoing is for general information purposes only and is the opinion of the writer. Securities mentioned carry risk of loss, and no guarantee of performance is made or implied. This information is not intended to provide specific personalized advice including, without limitation, investment, financial, legal, accounting, or tax advice. Always seek advice from your own financial advisor before making investment decisions.
Image: iStock.com/Stockernumber2
Try Fund Library Premium
For Free with a 30 day trial!