Join Fund Library now and get free access to personalized features to help you manage your investments.

U.S. Fed unexpectedly dovish

Published on 05-09-2024

Share This Article

No stagflation, no rate hike in the cards

 

Last week marked a significant pivot for U.S. market-watchers. A higher-than-expected U.S. Employment Cost Index increased the trepidation about the Federal Reserve (Fed) meeting, with fears growing that the Fed’s next move would be a rate hike in order to combat stubborn inflation. Not surprisingly, stocks went down and yields went up. But then a proverbial dam broke when the Fed was more dovish than expected in its statement and at its press conference.

At its meeting on May 1, the Fed noted the lack of progress on the disinflation front in the last several months but indicated that it would be patient. It also pointed to the incredible progress made on the disinflationary front in the past year.

In addition, when asked about the possibility of a rate hike, Fed Chair Jay Powell dismissed it, describing it as unlikely. And when asked if the U.S. is in a stagflationary environment, Powell was emphatic that it isn’t. Finally, the Fed also said it would be slowing the level of its balance sheet reduction.

Re-pricing of rate expectations for the year began immediately. The S&P 500 Index went up after the announcement and moved up even more after the start of the press conference. I think that speaks to the Fed's thoughtfulness and measured perspective – that it is not over-reacting to recent disappointing inflation data.

Weaker-than expected U.S. jobs report bolsters case for a rate cut

The press conference was followed later in the week by a Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey (JOLTS report) that showed job openings and quit rates had decreased – signs of an easing in the tight labour market.

That was followed by a U.S. jobs report that offered an even stronger sign of a cooling labour market, strengthening the case for a rate cut. Non-farm payrolls were far below expectations at 175,000 jobs added in April.1 But the most important part of the report was average hourly earnings, which came in below expectations – up only 0.2% for the month and 3.9% year over year.1

Markets rejoiced. The moves in the 2-year U.S. Treasury yield over the course of the week were significant, falling from an early peak above 5% to finish the week at 4.8%.2 The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield followed a similar pattern, peaking early in the week at 4.68% only to drop to 4.5% by the end of the week.2 The S&P 500 fell early in the week, only to rally later in the week as yields eased.

We also got signs of disinflationary progress in the eurozone last week. The flash estimate of April inflation in the eurozone was 2.4%.3 Inflation ex-food and energy was 2.8%, down from 3.1% in March and 3.3% in February.3 Not surprisingly, we saw a similar pattern with the Stoxx Europe 600 Index last week as we saw with the S&P 500 Index.

Economic softening or substantial slowdown?

Last week seemed to support the idea that the narrative has changed, that we are still “on the disinflationary train” because Western developed economies are sufficiently cooling. As I’ve said before, I fully believe we’re still on “the D train.” However, I can’t help but worry about the long and variable effects of monetary tightening. Are we seeing the “economic softening” that we need to get inflation completely under control, or are we seeing the start of a far more substantial slowdown? I think of recent data points such as these Purchasing Managers’ Indexes (PMI):

I will be vigilant given how aggressive the Fed’s tightening was and how long we have maintained rates at the peak for this tightening cycle. We would all like to think this turns out like the 1994-1995 Fed tightening cycle with the economy avoiding a recession. However, in that tightening cycle, only five months elapsed between the end of rate hikes and the start of rate cuts.7 In this tightening cycle, rate hikes ended in July 2023, and we are still waiting for our first rate cut; this allows for far more damage to potentially occur.

And, of course, the absolute level of tightening is much greater this time around, up 500 basis points versus 300 basis points in the 1994-1995 tightening cycle.7 That’s why I am very sensitive to any data and anecdotal information suggesting the economy is weakening quickly. Right now, I think it’s far more likely that we are getting the kind of economic softening the Fed wants, but I am not naïve about the risks.

Copper prices suggest global growth may be improving

The good news is that the outlook for global growth seems to be improving. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) updated its global outlook last week. It upwardly revised its 2024 global growth forecast to 3.1% (up from 2.9% in its previous forecast back in February) and its 2025 forecast to 3.2% (up from its last forecast of 3%).8 It’s worth noting the OECD upwardly revised its growth forecasts for both the U.S. and China.

It's not just the OECD. “Dr. Copper” – i.e., copper prices – seems to be suggesting the same thing. Market watchers have long looked to the price of copper as an indicator of the health of the global economy, especially China. That’s because copper is a fundamental raw material utilized in many industries and products. When demand for copper increases, it suggests economic growth may be rising because things are being built and manufactured. Copper has been on an upward climb since mid-February, despite a brief but significant drop last week before rebounding late in the week, suggesting that the global economy is improving. I suspect global small-cap stocks could experience a sustainable rally if more signs appear of this economic resurgence.

Kristina Hooper is Chief Global Market Strategist at Invesco.

Notes

1. Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 3, 2024.
2. Source: Bloomberg, as of May 3, 2024.
3. Source: Eurostat, as of April 30, 2024.
4. Source: Institute for Supply Management, April 30, 2024.
5. Source: ISM-Chicago, Inc., April 30, 2024.
6. Source: Conference Board, April 30, 2024.
7. Source: Federal Reserve Board of Governors.
8. Source: OECD, May 2, 2024.

Disclaimer

© 2024 by Invesco Canada. Reprinted with permission.

This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of May 6, 2024. These comments should not be construed as recommendations, but as an illustration of broader themes. This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or eliminate the risk of loss. All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.

Diversification does not guarantee a profit or eliminate the risk of loss.

All figures are in U.S. dollars.

This does not constitute a recommendation of any investment strategy or product for a particular investor. Investors should consult a financial professional before making any investment decisions.

All investing involves risk, including the risk of loss.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

In general, stock values fluctuate, sometimes widely, in response to activities specific to the company as well as general market, economic and political conditions.

Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses may all be associated with mutual fund investments. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. Please read the simplified prospectus before investing. Copies are available from your advisor or from Invesco Canada Ltd.

Investment funds are not guaranteed and are not covered by the Canada Deposit Insurance Corporation or by any other government deposit insurer. There can be no assurances that any fund or security will be able to maintain its net asset value per security at a constant amount or that the full amount of your investment in the fund will be returned to you. Fund values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated. No guarantee of performance is made or implied. The foregoing is for general information purposes only. This information is not intended to provide specific personalized advice including, without limitation, investment, financial, legal, accounting or tax advice.

Image: iStock.com/LightFieldStudios 

Join Fund Library now and get free access to personalized features to help you manage your investments.